Filings that were withdrawn and replaced

A restatement is a manager going back and replacing a 13F in full: the first version is withdrawn and a second takes its place. Every other site shows only the surviving version, so a position that was reported and then removed never existed as far as their readers know. Both are public, and the difference between them is simply a subtraction.

Ranked by how much of the filing changed, not by dollars - a manager moving 1% of a trillion is a rounding error, while a small firm moving a third of its book is not. Only revisions of at least 2% and $10.0M are listed; most restatements are ordinary housekeeping. Both versions must themselves be plausible filings - a first version totalling a few thousand dollars is a broken submission rather than a book, and the correction of one is not a revision of a portfolio. Pairs differing by almost exactly a thousandfold are left out too: those are the two versions disagreeing about whether values are in dollars or thousands, not a portfolio that changed. Stood is how long the withdrawn version was the public record.

Quarters before 2023 are shown as not comparable: filers reported in thousands until then, and comparing a filing from either side of that change would manufacture a thousandfold difference out of nothing.

This describes what was filed, not why. A restatement is usually a correction - a mis-keyed share count, a missing row - and nothing here asserts otherwise.